Critique of Archaeological Reason
3. Notes

Notes to Chapter 17. Conclusion

– May 2023

17.1 Archaeological reason
17.2 Grammar and hermeneutics
17.3 Structural archaeology
17.4 Archaeology and linguistics
17.5 Archaeology, digitality and philosophy
17.6 Archaeological reason for a living tradition
17.7 Critique and theory


17.1 Archaeological reason

  1. Panofsky 1955 Meaning.

     Back to top

17.3 Structural archaeology

  1. For a challenge to excavation as “destruction” and arguments for a more positive view, see Lucas 2001 Destruction.

    – [ Laerke Recht, March 2016]

  2. See Abadia & Palacio-perez 2015 Rethinking.

    – [ Giorgio Buccellati, July 2016]

     Back to top

17.4 Archaeology and linguistics

  1. Keesing R 1972 Paradigms Lost.

  2. Harris R 1987 Reading Saussure.

  3. Loprieno 1988 Topos Und Mimesis.

  4. Buccellati G 2012 Linguistic Model. For an important early statement, see Hymes 1970 Linguistic.

    – [ Giorgio Buccellati, July 2016]

     Back to top