11.1 Bracing the distance
11.1.1 The pre-digital phase
11.1.2 The digital innovation
11.1.3 Intentional dislocation
11.2 Structuring the data
11.2.1 Discontiguity
11.2.2 Capillarity of nodes
11.2.3 Integration of arrays
11.3 Structuring the argument
11.3.1 Discontinuity and sequentiality
11.3.2 Multilinear sequences
11.3.3 Polyhedral argument
11.3.4 Non-systemic sequences
11.3.5 Fluidity of structure and deconstruction
11.3.6 Semantic and lexical webs
11.4 The implicit argument
11.4.1 The data base as an argument
11.4.2 The argument function of sorting
11.4.3 The argument function of a word search
11.4.4 Evaluation
11.5 The narrative argument
11.5.1 Digital discourse, narrative, text
11.5.2 Primary and secondary narrative arguments
11.5.3 Automation: the primary narrative argument
11.5.4 The secondary narrative argument
11.6 Digital humanities and digital humanism
11.6.1 Digital humanities: the technical domain
11.6.2 Digital humanities: the conceptual domain
11.6.3 Perception
11.6.4 The reach of artificial constructs
11.7 The para-digital dimension
11.8 The notion of digital thought
11.9 A historical perspective on digital thought
11.9.1 Orality
11.9.2 From pre-literate to para-literate
11.9.3 Discontinuity and non-linearity
11.9.4 Becoming literate
11.9.5 From the Encyclopedie to digitality
11.1.1 The pre-digital phase
On the origins of writing, see Powell 2009 Writing.
– [ Laerke Recht, March 2016]
– [July 2016]
The “urban” revolution: Childe 1950 Urban Revolution.
– [ Laerke Recht, July 2016]
The beginning of language and concepts: Givon & Malle 2002 Evolution Of Language.
– [ Laerke Recht, July 2016]
11.1.2 The digital innovation
Relevance in archaeology, Evans & Daly 2006 Digital Archaeology.
– [ Laerke Recht, July 2016]
11.3.2 Multilinear sequences
Time consciousness: Husserl 1991 Consciousness Of Internal Time.
– [ Laerke Recht, July 2016]
11.3.4 Non-systemic sequences
Types of surfing: Sheehan 2002 Internet Sessions.
– [ Laerke Recht, August 2016]
11.3.6 Semantic and lexical webs
For the semantic web, see e.g. Berners- Lee &al 2001 Semantic, Berners- Lee &al 2008 Semantic and Richards 2006 E- Publication.
– [ Laerke Recht, July 2016]
11.4.2 The argument function of sorting
Minard graphics: Friendly 2002 Minard.
– [ Laerke Recht, July 2016]
11.4.3 The argument function of a word search
On the notion of non-occurrence see Levi- Strauss 1945 Analyse Structurale.
11.4.4 Evaluation
On the scholarly quality of open access documentation, especially with regard to peer review, see Kansa 2012 Openness, especially pp. 3-5.
11.5 The narrative argument
Back to top11.5.1 Digital discourse, narrative, text
Cognitive implications of multimedia learning, see Mayer 2005 Cambridge.
– [ Laerke Recht, August 2016]
Cf. literary digital narrative, Ryan 2002 Narrative In Digital Media.
– [ Laerke Recht, August 2016]
“Discourse”, Tilley 1990 Reading.
– [August 2016]
11.6 Digital humanities and digital humanism
Digital thought and theory in archaeology, Earl &al 2013 Archaeology Digital Era; Shott 2014 Digitizing Archaeology. Cf. also the website d-discourse.
– [ Laerke Recht, July 2016]
11.6.1 Digital humanities: the technical domain
Cf. Berry 2012 Digital Humanities.
– [ Laerke Recht, July 2016]
11.6.3 Perception
Seminal works include Mc Luhan 1962 Gutenberg, Mc Luhan 1964 Understanding Media and Mc Luhan & Fiore 1967 Medium.
– [ Laerke Recht, March 2016]
11.9.2 From pre-literate to para-literate
Consider this cuneiform tablet (Buccellati G 1966 Amorites, Plate VIII), from about 2000 B.C.
It lists individual animals given to certain individuals on given days of a given month. The single red circle highlights the tally of the animals for a day, and the double red circle the total for that day. At the end of the tablet (leftmost column) the grand totals are given: the single blue line highlights the totals by type of animal, and the double blue line gives the final grand total, which in cuneiform reads: 5 times 60 (the large vertical wedges), plus 10 (the oblique wedge head), plus 4 (the smaller vertical wedges). The connection is clear among all the various steps. It is non-linear, because it presupposes conceptual jumps, evinced by the sequence and general arrangement. Early writing in Mesopotamia, Powell 2009 Writing.
– [ Laerke Recht, August 2016]