CRITIQUE-OF-AR.NET/NOTES/17.htm – Version 1, August 2017.

Critique of Archaeological Reason
3. Notes

17. Conclusion

17.1 Archaeological reason
17.2 Grammar and hermeneutics
17.3 Structural archaeology
17.4 Archaeology and linguistics
17.5 Archaeology, digitality and philosophy
17.6 Archaeological reason for a living tradition
17.7 Critique and theory



17.1 Archaeological reason

a.Panofsky 1955 Meaning.
     Back to top

17.3 Structural archaeology

a.For a challenge to excavation as 'destruction' and arguments for a more positive view, see Lucas 2001a – [Laerke Recht, March 2016]
b.Abadía and Palacio-Pérez 2015 – [Giorgio Buccellati, July 2016]
     Back to top

17.4 Archaeology and linguistics

a.Keesing 1972 "Paradigms Lost"
b.Roy Harris 1987 Reading Saussure
c.Loprieno 1988 Topos und Mimesis
d.Buccellati 2012. For an important early statement, see Hymes 1970 – [Giorgio Buccellati, July 2016]
     Back to top