Critique of Archaeological Reason
|
| a. | Hermeneutics and philosophy: Davey 2006; Figal 2006; Gadamer 1976. – [July 2016] |
| b. | Kant: 1781, 1788, 1790. – [July 2016] |
| a. | On the "fashion" of structuralism see Caws 1997 |
| b. | The expression "a long argument" was dear to Darwin, see note 12.4.1 |
| c. | A similar idea of the 'construct' of data can be found in Roskams 2001 – [Laerke Recht, February 2014] |
| d. | For a problematisation of the relationship between 'experts' and public and the hidden hierarchies and territorial boundaries implicated, see Karlsson and Gustafsson 2006. – [Laerke Recht, October 2014] |
| a. | For a recent review of the current status of archaeological theory and method, see Cooney 2009. – [Laerke Recht, July 2016] |
| a. | For a comparison of the concept behind the critique of excavation and Kant's Critiques, see bibliographical entries under Kant 1781, 1788 and 1790 and and in the monograph on Kant. – [Laerke Recht, February 2014] |
| b. | On the propaedeutic nature of Kant's Critique see the monograph on Kant. |
| a. | "Long argument": see 12.4.1 |
| b. | One finds in de Saussure a similar Kantian approach in the notion that the viewpoint of the observer constitutes the proper object of study, see Harris 1987. |
| c. | Cf. the discussion on argumentation in archaeology and its relation to theory in Smith 2015. – [Laerke Recht, November 2015] |
| d. | Data as not data: Hodder & Hutson 2003, p. 146. – [Laerke Recht, July 2016] |